AA

Language:

Recognition of foreign1 qualifications for mobility and lifelong learning. Self-assessment tool

Instructions: Mark the appropriate coloured circle:

● yes/to a significant extent   ● more or less/partially   ● no/needs to be initiated

Recognition of foreign credentials / diplomas / qualifications: scope, applications, applicants in your country context

Scope of recognition of foreign qualifications

1. Is academic and professional recognition of foreign qualifications defined in the legislation or regulated?

2. Is integration of (returning) migrants and refugees an explicit purpose of recognition of foreign diplomas and qualifications?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

Applications

1. Recognition of full degrees, using the Diploma Supplement and the QF-EHEA

2. Recognition of qualifications, for allowing entry or re-entry into higher education (with the possibility to grant dispensation of the programme)

3. Recognition of short study periods performed elsewhere, using e.g. through ECTS

4. Recognition of qualifications from vocational education and training institutions (all levels of qualification)

5. Recognition of professional qualifications for regulated professions

6. Recognition of qualifications for other employment purposes

7. Recognition of learning outcomes from open education resources, for example learning online and other forms of learning outside of the formal systems
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

1 Including qualifications held by citizens of foreign countries or held by citizens of your country who return from abroad

Applicants

1. University students or applicants to higher education institutions / programmes

2. Students of general education or their families

3. Students of vocational education and training

4. Education and training institutions

5. Enterprises

6. (Returning) migrants; refugees

7. Foreign citizens: please specify what category
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

For reflection

  • Are recognition practices in your country sufficiently dynamic and able to adapt to new needs and trends in the world of qualifications and learning (e.g. more requests for recognising foreign professional qualifications, applications from migrants, refugees, etc).

Current practice of recognition of foreign qualifications: in higher education, general education and VET, and for other forms of learning and acquisition of qualifications

1. Is there a general framework for recognition of foreign qualifications, regardless of the sub-sector of education, training or type of qualification?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

In higher education

1. Is recognition of qualifications implemented fully in accordance with the E-Manual of the European Area of Recognition (EAR)?

2. Are ENIC and HEIs cooperating effectively?

3. Is alternative recognition2 – and the right to appeal – used commonly cases of possible alternative recognition and of appeal addressed and solved efficiently?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

In general education

1. Is there a specific institution in charge of recognition of foreign general education diplomas?

2. Is recognition decentralised at the level of education providers?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

2 Alternative recognition may include:
(i) recognition of the foreign qualification as comparable to a qualification of the host country, but not to that indicated by the applicant;
(ii) partial recognition of the foreign qualification;
(iii) full or partial recognition of the foreign qualification subject to the applicant successfully taking additional examinations or aptitude tests; (iv) full or partial recognition of the foreign qualification at the end of a probationary period, possibly subject to specified conditions.

Source: Council of Europe/ UNESCO, Revised recommendation on criteria and procedures for the assessment of foreign qualifications, 2010.

Vocational education and training3

1. .Is there is a specific institution in charge of recognition of foreign VET qualifications?

2. Is recognition decentralised at the level of education providers?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

Other contexts (other types of qualifications, special situations)4

1. Are there specific procedures to recognise foreign qualifications of this category (see definition in footnote 2)?

2. Is it clear which institution(s) is (are) in charge of recognition of diplomas outside formal general education, VET and higher education?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

For reflection

  • Are current practices of recognition of diplomas / qualifications in the different sub-sectors quality-assured, effective and coherent?
  • Do your institutions in charge of recognition of foreign qualifications gather relevant data and analyse main trends, problems and emerging needs?

3 All levels of formal VET in your country
4 This refers to qualifications awarded outside of the formal education and training system: e.g. international qualifications, including sectoral or professional qualifications, qualifications from international corporations and organisations

Regulated professions 5 and recognition of foreign professional qualifications

1. Is the legal and regulatory framework for the exercise of regulated professions well-established and transparent for the wider public, the economic sectors and the education and training providers?

2. Is it easy to identify the appropriate institution(s) in charge of recognition of professional qualifications?

3. Is there is a common framework for recognition of professional qualifications?

4. Is there is a single database / list of regulated professions that is regularly updated and easily accessible to users?

5. Are there specific international / bilateral agreements on this matter – in application?

6. Are there mechanisms for automatic recognition for (some) regulated professions?

7. Is there cooperation with the EU (and its institutions) on these matters, in form of projects, exchanges and networks, capacity—building and others?

8. Is data on recognition of professional qualifications collected, analysed and reported on a regular basis?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

For reflection

  • How does your framework of regulated professions evolve, and how does it impact mobility of learners and workers? Is regulation having a negative impact on professional mobility? Are too many professions regulated, or is more regulation needed to strengthen trust in professionals.
  • Do the education and training institutions comply with minimum training requirements for regulated professions?
  • Most Eastern Partnership countries may face certain skill shortages for qualified workers, as they have aging populations or want/need to expand jobs in certain key sectors. Is your country open to international cooperation to ease recognition and/or to deregulate some regulated professions or reform the Tariff Qualification System?

5 There are essentially two ways to regulate professions: the use of specific titles is controlled (for instance, the title Certified Translator), but one can practise without other restrictions, or the practice of the profession is restricted (for instance, Medical Doctor, or Engineer): it is legally forbidden to practise the profession unless specific requirements are met. Additionally, even if an occupation is not formally regulated, there may still be restrictions to employment, in that employers may impose specific requirements, like membership in a professional association, or having certain academic credentials.

Transparency tools and recognition of foreign qualifications: NQFs; use of learning outcomes; credit systems; diploma and certificate supplement; quality assurance (QA) framework and procedures

1. Do credential evaluators adequately and consistently use the information available on the NQF of the country issuing the diploma, and check whether it is referenced with the EQF and/or QF-EHEA, if applicable?

2. Is information on QA systems of the country issuing the qualification used in recognition processes?

3. Is information on credits and credit systems used in recognition procedures /practice?

4. Is information about national qualifications shared and presented in a transparent way with recognition bodies abroad, and are recognition bodies abroad informed about new developments?

5. Are applicants discouraged from misrepresenting qualifications / committing fraud?

6. Are cases of systematic fraud and misrepresentation of qualifications identified effectively and addressed immediately using existing procedures?

7. Do evaluators have access to credible information on non-authorised institutions /diploma mills and cases of fraud and misrepresentation of qualifications?

8. Are recognition bodies in my country planning to join the Groningen Declaration for digital student data exchange?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

For reflection

  • Can recognition practice support better use of QA mechanisms, and demonstrate the benefits of the various transparency tools?
  • Which important elements of transparency are not yet in place / not used?

Addressing challenges in recognition of foreign qualifications: application of procedures; red tape; cost; transparency / information; institutional capacity

1. Are recognition processes relatively affordable, with transparent procedures that are easy to use by applicants?

2. Can candidates for recognition monitor progress of their applications online, and receive tailored feedback and support from a helpdesk?

3. Are there time-bound standards for processing applications?

4. Are incomplete / stalled / failed recognition processes monitored so that they don’t create a large stock of unsuccessful applications and affect the effectiveness of the recognition system / practice?

5. Are credential evaluators properly trained and kept up to date with new developments?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

For reflection

  • What are the main challenges and difficulties faced by applicants from your country in recognition processes abroad?
  • And by applicants in your country (foreigners and national citizens)?
  • What important shortcomings in terms of capacity and administration adversely affect recognition practice and outcomes?
  • Is the practical application of all recognition procedures generally considered efficient, fair and proportional by applicants, credential evaluators, and relevant institutions?

International cooperation facilitating recognition of foreign qualifications

1. Are bilateral agreements on recognition signed and operational with the most relevant countries?

2. Are the arrangements on recognition of foreign qualifications under the Lisbon Recognition Convention applied effectively?

3. Are there clear processes for dealing with the recognition of undocumented qualifications of migrants and refugees?

4. Are new important aspects of a globalised education and training market e.g. international qualifications provided through internet and/or through training providers located in your country sufficiently addressed in recognition conventions and procedures signed by your country?

5. Do you have sufficient access to international information systems on qualifications, institutions and quality assurance practices to support the credibility and efficiency of recognition of qualifications?
Comments
Add your own question
Edit your question
Cancel
Confirm

For reflection

  • How does the country participate and contribute to new global developments related with recognition of foreign diplomas and qualifications?
Priorties
1
2
3
4
5
Comments
Roadmap - Burning issues
1 2
3 4
Comments
Please check your answers
To create a form you need to at least answer 1 question